The firm's participation is the foundation of how the division operates, not a feature of it. Through cash co-investment, equity participation, or carried economics; the economics, judgement, and risk sit in the same place.
Capital arrangement that does not include the firm's own position is not capital arrangement. It is placement. The two look similar from the outside and run on entirely different incentives.
"Capital arrangement that does not include the firm's own position is not capital arrangement. It is placement."
A placement agent is paid on closing. The agent's economic outcome is the same whether the transaction performs well or poorly after close. The investor's outcome is not. This is a known structural problem in the market and the reason most placement-only relationships are managed at arm's length by the investor's own due diligence.
A firm that participates in the transaction is on the same incentive curve as the investor. The underwriting bar is the firm's bar for what it will own, which is necessarily higher than its bar for what it will arrange for others to own. The firm's selection process is the investor's selection process. The portfolio that emerges from this work is the firm's portfolio; it accumulates over time, and the firm's reputation accumulates with it.
The economics, the judgement, and the risk sit in the same place by design. This is the original merchant banking architecture. It was the standard for a hundred and fifty years before it was fragmented through the 1980s and 1990s into specialist boutiques, fee-only advisory firms, and discretionary fund managers. Ladd Capital reassembles the integration.
Participation takes three forms, applied per transaction based on the structure that best aligns the firm with the outcome.
The firm commits its own capital into the same vehicle as syndicated investors, on the same terms. The firm's capital is at risk on the same basis as the investor's. The most direct form of alignment and the default where the structure supports it.
The firm takes a structured equity position in the target company, directly on the cap table. Used where the transaction benefits from direct firm participation alongside the syndicated investor base, typically larger transactions, control or near-control situations, and structures requiring firm-level governance involvement.
The firm takes a portion of investor returns above an agreed hurdle. The firm earns when investors earn beyond a threshold; the firm earns nothing if the threshold is not met. Used to align the firm with the long-arc outcome of the transaction rather than the closing event alone.
The firm's underwriting work is the basis on which the transaction is shown. Every transaction shown to investors has already passed the firm's own test for capital deployment. The firm's economic interest in the outcome is visible in the deal terms; the firm participates on the same basis or on structured terms that depend on investor performance.
There is no information the firm holds about a transaction that investors do not also hold. The firm's diligence file becomes the basis of the investor's diligence file. The firm's underwriting model is shared in full. The firm's structuring decisions are explained in detail.
The firm does not get paid unless investors get paid. The economics are structured so that the firm's outcome depends on the investor's outcome, not the closing event.
The firm is a counterparty, not an agent. When the firm arranges a transaction, the firm is also on the cap table or carrying structured economics in the outcome. The firm's interests are aligned with the company's long-term performance, not with the closing event.
The relationship continues through the holding period. The firm participates in governance where appropriate, supports follow-on financing, and engages with strategic exits. The firm's reputation is attached to the transaction's outcome, which creates a different kind of accountability than fee-only mandates produce.
The firm does not run mandates where it cannot participate. Where the structure of a transaction precludes firm participation, the firm declines the engagement or restructures it so participation is possible. This is the operating constraint.
The principle is operational, not aspirational. Every Capital engagement letter specifies the form of firm participation. Mandates are declined where participation is structurally impossible. Pure placement-agent work is not offered. Fee-only advisory on capital arrangement is not offered.
This is the constraint that defines the division. It is also the constraint that defines the firm's portfolio over time.
If you are a principal raising capital, the firm's participation makes it a different kind of counterparty than a placement agent. Bring the situation to the firm; the engagement begins with the firm's own underwriting.
If you are deploying capital, the firm's participation makes it a different kind of sponsor than a fund manager. The investor sees the same deal the firm sees, on the same basis.
Start investing